Two Segregation Ratios Possible

Chi Squared Short Formula

Hypothesis

Example

Another Example

F2 Data in Coupling Phase Linkage

F2 Data in Repulsion Phase Linkage

  Click here for a
printer-friendly version

X2 Short Formula

Suppose the ratio is X1:X2, then the proportions are:
   X1   
and
   X2   
;
X1+X2
X1+X2
    

Also, the expected numbers for each class would be
(n)
   X1   
and (n)
  X2   
 
X1+X2
X1+X2
 

Back to our example, we have the ambiguous segregation ratio 1.9640:1 which can be converted to proportions:
1.9640
and
  (1)  
   
2.9640
2.9640
   
 

Then the expected number of each class are:
(n)1.9640
and
  n(1)  
   
2.9640
2.9640
   

The short formula for a X2 of a 3:1 ratio is:
X2 =
[a1 - a2(3)]2
= 3.841      
3n
     
     
Now we know a1 is the expected number of the dominant class and a2 is the expected number of the recessive class. Then substituting the ambiguous expected numbers for each class gives:

X2 = 3.84 =
[
1.9640(n)
-
1(n)(3)
] 2
2.9640
2.9640
 
3n
 

Now we solve for n to find the critical F2 family size such that more than r recessives indicates a 9:7 ratio and less than r recessives indicates a 3:1 ratio.

3.84 =        n2        x   (1.96-3)2 x   1  
            (2.9640)            1         3n


3.84 =   (1.04)2   x  n 
          (2.9640)2     3

n = 94.31

We must grow 95 plants to distinguish a 3:1 ratio from a 9:7 ratio.

Let n=94, we use the ambigous ratio to derive the observed class and test with a X2 to try to distinguish the two ratios.

The dominant class will have the observed number

(95)  1.964  = 62.9~63.
        2.964

The observed number for the recessive class
(95)      1    = 32.
        2.964

Copyright 2000©, Ted Helms

Back | Home | Top | Next
Home Forward Back