Results and
Discussion
Recorded daily ambient temperatures varied
from maximums of 18oF to minimums of
-20oF during the urine collection
period. Temperatures inside the barn were
maintained above freezing (32oF to 48
oF). Urinary output based on a 12-hour
collection was measured for each treatment group.
Urinary volume averages were 1.62 pints for
water-restricted confined mares (Group I); 1.93
pints for water-restricted, exercised mares
(Group II); and 1.82 pints for ad libitum water,
confined mares (Group III). The mares that were
allowed 1 hour free exercise had slightly greater
(P<.05) urinary output than those mares that
were confined at all times. Urinary E2
and cortisol concentrations in pregnant mares are
presented in Table 1.
Manipulating the water intake of pregnant mares
in long-term confinement appears to affect
urinary E2 concentration. Mares that
were confined but had free access to water (Group
III) had greater E2 concentrations
(P<.0001) than mares that were confined and
had restricted access to water (Group I; Figure 1
b&w graph 30KB gif).
Estradiol concentrations were not different
(P>.05) between confined mares (Group I) and
those that were exercised daily during the 14 day
sampling period (Group II; Figure
2 b&w graph
29KB gif), although the exercised group
had slightly greater E2 concentrations
on 11 of 14 days.
| Table 1.
Mean daily urinary hormone output in
pregnant mares with or without exercise
and controlled water intake. |
|
| Hormone |
Restricted
water,
confined |
Restricted
water,
exercised |
Ad libitum
water,
confined |
| Sample number |
206 |
344 |
344 |
| Cortisol (µg/100 ml) |
1.49±.03* |
1.53±.05^ |
1.59±.05*^ |
| Estradiol (ng/mgCR) |
1.83±.06* |
2.45±.11* |
3.05±.18^ |
|
| *,^ means within rows with
uncommon superscripts differ (P< .01). |
Mares that had restricted water and daily
exercise (Group II) had greater (P<.01)
urinary cortisol concentrations than those that
were left in confinement (Group I; Figure 3
b&w graph 32KB gif). The
amount of water intake in either the confined
groups or the exercised mares failed to affect
cortisol secretion rates (Figure
4 b&w graph
30KB gif).
Discussion
Confinement was not found to have a major
influential effect on urinary E2
secretion. Ginther (1992) reported plasma E2
concentrations during mid-gestation (120 to 240
d) of 20 to 60 pg/ml. There is a dramatic
increase in estrone during the fourth month of
pregnancy, and these high concentrations are
maintained until the eighth month. Free access to
water resulted in elevated E2
concentrations in urine but was not found to
influence urinary cortisol values. The observed
elevated urinary E2 concentrations in
confined mares offered free-choice water and
those same mares having slightly elevated
cortisol levels may have been influenced by the
relationship between estrogen and corticosteroid
binding globulin (CBG) in the pregnant mare.
Pregnant mares that were allowed 1 hour per
day of exercise were found to have elevated
urinary cortisol concentrations. James et al.
(1970) studied the effect of exercise on cortisol
levels in racehorses and found that the horse was
not greatly influenced by exercise unless it is
of greater magnitude than established training
regimes. The mean urinary cortisol concentrations
in all treatments (Table 1) were lower than
previously reported plasma-based data for
pregnant mares at rest (Hoffsis et al.,
1970). James et al. (1970) established
that normal plasma cortisol values in horses
range from 3 to 13 ug/100 ml, and that
urine sample concentrations parallel these
values. In addition plasma cortisol
concentrations were not affected by age, sex,
pregnancy, or time of day (Hoffsis et al.,
1970). Mal et al. (1991b) reported that
confined mares appear to exhibit intermediate
cortisol values, sometimes being the same as
pasture mares or total isolation mares.
Temperature data collected during the sampling
period from north central North Dakota weather
stations indicated minimum daily temperatures
were below 32oF each day. Houpt and
Houpt (1988) reported that cold environmental
temperatures negatively affect behavior in horses
in separated conditions, that is, horses that
were in a pen alone but had contact with other
horses in adjacent pens. Their hypothesis (when
an animal is prevented from exhibiting a normal
behavior such as walking, trotting, cantering,
and standing, the behavior will be amplified once
the restraint is removed) did not hold true when
their experimental horses were exposed to
temperatures below freezing. In our study the
mares demonstrated increased activity when
exercised and often circled the paddock several
times at a trot or canter before returning to the
in-gate. This increased daily activity coupled
with exposure to extreme cold temperatures during
the sample collection period could have been a
factor in the observed elevated cortisol
concentrations.
Conclusions/Implications
of this research
The results support the removal of water
restrictions in pregnant mares providing urine
for PMU collection centers. Estrogen
concentrations were shown to be greater in mares
not restricted in water intake versus those
restricted to 7 gallons/day. Mares totally
confined were observed to have lower cortisol
concentrations than those permitted an hour of
exercise per day, suggesting the confined mares
were not subject to more stress than those
allowed free movement.
Additional/future
research needs resulting from this project
The aspect of the nutritional needs of
the pregnant mares in the PMU collection centers
have not been evaluated as to the effect diet may
have on urine quantity and quality relative to
hormone activity. The dietary factors such as
salt and minerals should be investigated as to
their role in the productive capacity of this
class of livestock.
References
Caljuk, E.A. 1961.
Water metabolism and water requirements of
horses. Nutr. Abs. Rev. 32:574.
Christison, G. I., and H. D.
Johnson. 1972. Cortisol turnover in heat-stressed
cows. J. Anim. Sci. 33:1005-1010.
Cymbalyk, N.F. 1989. Water
balance of horses fed various diets. Equine Prac.
11:19-24.
Friend, T. H., and G. R.
Dellmeier. 1986. Recent developments in stress
research. Prof. Anim. Sci. 2:(2) 1-6.
Ginther, O.J. 1992.
Reproductive Biology of the Mare: Basic and
Applied Aspects, (2nd Ed.). Equservices, Cross
Plains, Wisconsin.
Hoffsis, G. F., P. W. Murdick,
V. L. Tharp, and K. Ault. 1970. Plasma
concentrations of cortisol and corticosterone in
the normal horse. Am. J. Vet. Res.
31(8):1379-1387.
Houpt, K. A., and T. R. Houpt.
1988. Social illumination preferences of mares.
J. Anim. Sci. 66:2159-2164.
James, V. H. T., M. W. Horner,
M. S. Moss, and A. E. Rippon. 1970.
Adrenocortical function in the horse. J.
Endocrinol. 48:319-335.
Mal, M. E., T. H. Friend, D. C.
Lay, S. G. Vogelsang, and O. C. Jenkins. 1991b.
Behavioral responses of mares to short term
confinement and social isolation. Equine Vet.
Sci. 11:96-102.
McCall, C. A., G. D. Potter, J.
L. Kreider, and W. L. Jenkins. 1987.
Physiological responses in foals weaned by abrupt
or gradual methods. J. Equine Vet. Res.
76:368-374.
Monfort, S. L., N. P. Arthur,
and D. E. Wildt. 1991. Monitoring ovarian
function and pregnancy by evaluating excretion of
urinary oestrogen conjugates in semi-free-ranging
Przewalski's horses (Equus przewalskii).
J. Reprod. Fertil. 91:155-164.
Nett, T. M., D. W. Holtan, and
V. L. Estergreen. 1973. Plasma estrogens in
pregnant and postpartum mares. J. Anim. Sci.
37:962-970.
Terqui, M., and E. Palmer.
1979. Oestrogen pattern during early pregnancy in
the mare. J. Reprod. Fertil. 27(Suppl.):441-446.
Thompson, D. L. Jr., F. Garza,
Jr., P. S. Mitchell, and R. L. St. George. 1988.
Effects of short-term stress, xylazine
tranquilization and anesthetization with xylazine
plus ketamine on plasma concentrations of
cortisol, luteinizating hormone, follicle
stimulating hormone and prolactin in
ovariectomized pony mares. Theriogenology.
30:(5)937-946.
Links to www sites
of related research findings
American Association of
Equine Practitioners
http://www.aaep.org/index.html
Project Background
Authors
Carmelita
Lamb, Graduate Assistant
Department of Animal and Range Sciences
North Dakota State University
Fargo, ND 58105
clamb@ndsuext.nodak.edu
R.M Weigl,
Research Specialist II
Department of Animal and Range Sciences
North Dakota State University
Fargo, ND 58105
weigl@badlands.nodak.edu
Dr. Jim Tilton, Professor
Department of Animal and Range Sciences
North Dakota State University
Fargo, ND 58105
jtilton@ndsuext.nodak.edu
Corresponding
author
Dr. Jim Tilton
Hultz Hall, NDSU
Fargo, ND 58105
Location
where the research was (primarily) done
NDSU SARC Laboratory
Bottineau, North Dakota
Funding
source of the project
Hatch Funds
Additional
credits the author(s) need to give
Donald Bryant Family, St. John, North Dakota
BACK
Table
of Contents Fall 1997
|