Conclusions/Implications
of this research
Postplant tillage was less effective than
herbicides for controlling weeds in flax, lentil
and hard red spring wheat in this research. These
results do not support the substitution of
postplant tillage for herbicide treatment when
these crops are included in a rotation. The lack
of weed control from rotary hoeing or harrowing
suggests that weed pressure could be severe in
crops following flax, lentil and hard red spring
wheat in a crop sequence unless an aggressive
control strategy was implemented. Ultimately, the
cost of controlling weeds in subsequent crops
could offset any possible savings that may result
from substitution of tillage for herbicide
treatment. Postplant tillage was
inconsistent for controlling weeds under the
environmental conditions encountered during this
experiment. Harrowing and rotary hoeing may more
effectively control weeds in other environments.
For example, postplant tillage may be effective
for controlling weeds in flax, lentil and hard
red spring wheat when weeds are germinating and
emerging during prolonged dry periods. Weeds also
may be controlled by postplant tillage used in
combination with cultural control methods, such
as delaying the seeding date or increasing the
seeding rate.
Postplant tillage reduced
broadleaf weed biomass compared to forgoing any
attempt to control weeds in this experiment. This
finding supports the use of postplant tillage for
controlling common lambsquarters, redroot pigweed
and other annual broadleaf weeds in organic and
other farming systems where herbicides are not
used in flax, lentil and hard red spring wheat.
Additional/future
research needs resulting from this project
Information is needed on the potential
for weed control from using herbicides at reduced
rates along with postplant tillage in flax,
lentil and hard red spring wheat. The impact of
postplant tillage on weed biomass production
should be determined for other crops included in
rotations involving flax, lentil and hard red
spring wheat. The weed control that results when
using various types of modern rotary hoe and
harrow designs also should be studied. Economic
comparisons between postplant tillage and
herbicide treatments are needed in flax, lentil
and hard red spring wheat.
References
Beard, L.W., and E.
Waldhaus. 1997. North Dakota agricultural
statistics. Ag. Stats. Bull. No. 65. North Dakota
State Univ., Fargo.
Boerboom, C.M.,
and F.L. Young. 1995. Effect of postplant tillage
and crop density on broadleaf weed control in dry
pea (Pisum sativum) and lentil (Lens
culinaris). Weed Technol. 9:99-106.
Carr, P.M., J.C.
Gardner, B.G. Schatz, S.W. Zwinger and S.J.
Guldan. 1995. Grain yield and weed biomass of a
wheat-lentil intercrop. Agron. J. 87:574-579.
Carr, P.M., G.B.
Martin, and J.D. Harris. 1996. Effect of
postplant tillage with and without herbicides on
weed control in flax. p. 149-153. In J.F.
Carter (ed.) Proc. of the 56th Flax Inst. United
States. 20-22 March, 1996, Fargo.
Mulder, T.A., and
J.D. Doll. 1993. Integrating reduced herbicide
use with mechanical weeding in corn (Zea mays).
Weed Technol. 7:382-389.
Savage, D.C., and
M.M. Loux. 1992. Integrating herbicides, hoes,
shanks and cranks for weed control in soybeans -
Ohio State research results. Proc. North Centr.
Weed Sci. Soc. 47:119-120.
SAS Institute.
1985. SAS procedures guide for personal
computers. Version 6 ed. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
Smolik, J., L.
Evjen, K. Lewis, and P. Wieland. 1991. Mechanical
and chemical weed control in spring wheat. p. 36.
Plant Sci. Pamphlet No. 43. 1990 Annual Progress
Rep., Northeast Research Stat., Watertown, SD.
Zollinger, R.K.
(ed.). 1997. North Dakota weed control guide.
North Dak. (Fargo) Ext. Serv. Circ. W-253 (Rev.).
Links to www sites
of related research findings
Vice President and Dean
of Agricultural Affairs
North Dakota State University
http://www.ag.ndsu.nodak.edu
Project Background
Authors
Patrick
M. Carr, Associate Agronomist
Dickinson Research Extension Center
Adjunct Assistant Professor
Department of Plant Sciences
North Dakota State University
Fargo, ND 58105
pat_carr@dsu1.dsu.nodak.edu
http://www.ag.ndsu.nodak.edu/dickinso/
Glenn B. Martin, Research Specialist II
Dickinson Research Extension Center
North Dakota State University
http://www.ag.ndsu.nodak.edu/dickinso/
Jerry D. Harris, Farm Manager
CVSR Box 1120
Moab, UT 84532-1120
jwhharris@juno.com
Corresponding
author
P.M. Carr
Location
where the research was (primarily) done
Dickinson
Research Extension Center
Dickinson, North Dakota
Funding
source of the project
state appropriated
Additional
credits the author(s) need to give
B.A.
Melchior for assistance in implementing the
experiment and in processing the data.
BACK |
Next
Article
Table
of Contents Fall 1997
|