North Dakota State University

NDSU

North Central Research Extension Center
Brian Jenks
Weed Scientist
bjenks@ndsuext.nodak.edu

 
Denise Markle
Research Specialist
dmarkle@ndsuext.nodak.edu
Gary Willoughby
Research Specialist
gwillough@ndsuext.nodak.edu
5400 Highway 83 South
Minot, ND  58701-7662
701.857.7679
701.857.7676 (fax)

Study Name: Timing of weed control in Roundup Ready canola

Study Number: 9908

Objectives: Evaluate weed control with Roundup applied at different rates and stages

Results: Flea beetle pressure was extremely high in 1999. The canola seed was treated with Gaucho, but a foliar insecticide application was needed to help reduce the flea beetle pressure. The canola remained in the cotyledon to 2-leaf stage for an extended period due to the flea beetles and wet soil. The Roundup Ready canola emerged before other canola varieties in this same field but was hit hard by the flea beetles and never really looked good the rest of the year.

The objective of this study was to compare weed control from soil-applied products with Roundup at different rates and timings. The primary weeds were kochia, foxtails, lambsquarters, and pigweed. Other species present were shepherdspurse, field pennycress, and biennial wormwood. Treflan and Sonalan did not control the mustard species or biennial wormwood, but generally provided good control of kochia, foxtails, lambsquarters, and pigweed. Treflan or Sonalan followed by a postemergence application of Roundup was as effective or better than Treflan or Sonalan alone.

Roundup was effective at any rate on kochia, foxtails, lambsquarters, redroot pigweed, biennial wormwood, field pennycress, and shepherdspurse. Roundup applied only at cotyledon to 2-leaf canola controlled emerged weeds, but missed a new flush of weeds that emerged soon after application. Canola yields were higher with the later application timings compared to the cotyledon to 2-leaf application. The split applications of Liberty also provided effective weed control.

Table. Timing of weed control in Roundup Ready canola.

      June 25 July 26  
Treatmenta Rate Timingb Kocz Fxtlc Colq Rrpw Kocz Yield
      ------------------------Control (%)------------------------ lb/A
Treflan 1.5 pt A 78 91 100 100 58 1050
Treflan / Assure II 1.5 pt / 8 fl oz A / C 68 98 96 95 60 918
Sonalan 2 pt A 79 97 100 98 68 828
Sonalan / Assure II 2 pt / 8 fl oz A / C 81 99 97 98 73 775
Treflan / Roundup 1.5 pt / 1 pt A / C 100 100 100 100 96 1010
Sonalan / Roundup 2 pt / 1 pt A / C 100 100 100 100 94 1093
Roundup 1 pt B 78 85 87 78 58 1110
Roundup 1 pt C 98 98 100 99 90 1206
Roundup 1 pt D 100 100 100 100 97 1386
Roundup / Roundup 1 pt / 1 pt B / D 100 99 100 100 95 1219
Roundup / Roundup 0.5 pt / 0.5 pt B / D 93 100 95 97 85 1330
Handweed Check +   100 100 100 100 96 1100
   Treflan / Roundup 1.5 pt / 1 pt A / C            
Weedy Check     0 0 0 0 0 611
LSD     6 6 6 6 6 295
CV     4 4 4 4 5 17

a All Roundup treatments included AMS (1%)
b
A=PPI; B=cotyledon to 2-lf canola; C=3 to 4-lf canola; D=5 to 6-leaf canola
c
Fxtl=green and yellow foxtail


Ag Alerts |  Agronomic Research |  Canola Rotation Study |  Foundation Seed Information |  Fungicide Research |  Livestock Notes
Personnel |  Pest Notes |  Upcoming Events |  Variety Trial Data (NCREC) |  Weather Data (NCREC) |  Weed Control Research


All Research Extension Centers
                   
   

 
   

Last Updated: Thursday, May 27, 2004 02:49:18 PM
Published by North Dakota State University