North Dakota State University

NDSU

North Central Research Extension Center Jan Knodel
Crop Protection Specialist
jknodel@ndsuext.nodak.edu
5400 Highway 83 South
Minot, ND  58701-7662
701.857.7679
701.857.7676 (fax)

   

Insecticide Efficacy against Sunflower beetles on Sunflower, 2004

 

Janet J. Knodel, Area Extension Specialist – Crop Protection

Lorilie Atkinson, Research Specialist

North Central Research and Extension Center

 

Sunflower beetleZygogramma exclamationis (Fabricius)

 

Registered and experimental insecticides were evaluated for their efficacy at controlling sunflower beetle and protecting sunflowers. The research plots at the North Central Research Extension Center in Minot, ND had pretreatment counts of an average of 9.4 larvae/plant and 12.5% defoliation on R2 stage sunflower. The economic threshold level for sunflower beetle larvae is 10-15 larvae/plant or 25% defoliation. Plots were 10 ft wide by 30 ft long. A RCB experimental design with four replicates was used. Insecticides were applied at R2 sunflower stage on 29 July using a handheld CO2 boom sprayer at 40 psi, 10 gpa and fitted with XR 8001VS nozzles. Five plants were assessed per plot for the number of larvae per plant and percent defoliation at 1, 7, 14, and 21 Days After Treatment (DAT). Variables were subjected to ANOVA and means compared using Fisher’s PLSD at the 5% significance level. 

 

At 1 DAT, all of the insecticides treatments had significantly lower numbers of larvae/plant than the untreated check, except for both rates of Dimilin. Dimilin acts as an insect growth regulator and insect populations are usually reduced 7-10 DAT. There were no significant defoliation differences among treatments at 1 DAT.  At 7, 14 and 21 DAT, defoliation was significantly reduced in all insecticide treatments compared to the untreated check. However, differences between insecticide treatments were not significantly different from each other. Differences between insecticide treatments at 7 DAT were not significantly different from each other in their ability to control sunflower beetle larvae, and all treatments were significantly better than the untreated check. At 14 DAT, all insecticide treatments significantly reduced the number of larvae/plant compared to the untreated check. Dimilin applied at the 1 fl oz/a rate also had a significantly higher larval count than the remaining insecticide treatments at 14 DAT. No larval counts were conducted on 21 DAT, because sunflower beetle larvae had dropped to the soil to pupate. These results indicate that most of the insecticides tested were able to reduce sunflower beetle larval numbers and defoliation, and protect sunflowers from injury up to 21 DAT.

 

Treatment/

Rate

Pre-evaluation

1 DAT

7 DAT

14 DAT

21 DATa

formulation

fl oz/acre

R2 – Jul 28

R2 – Jul 30

R3 – Aug 5

R4 – Aug 12

R4-5.7 - Aug 19

 

 

Larvae

%

Larvae

%

Larvae

%

Larvae

%

%

 

 

/plant

Def.

/plant

Def.

/plant

Def.

/plant

Def.

Def.

Untreated check

 

8.7 a

13.3 a

9.2 a

12.8 a

4.2 a

20.8 a

3.6 a

16.5 a

29.0 a

Furadan 4 EC

16

8.9 a

12.5 a

0.8 c

13.3 a

0.0 b

5.8b

0.0 c

1.0 b

12.0 b

Mustang Max 0.8 EC

2.8

10.5 a

14.0 a

0.7 c

11.3 a

0.0 b

7.3 b

0.0 c

1.5 b

10.5 b

Mustang Max 0.8 EC

4

10.2 a

12.5 a

0.4 c

11.5 a

0.0 b

6.5 b

0.0 c

0.8 b

9.9 b

Baythroid 2 EC

2.8

10.9 a

12.8 a

0.5 c

11.5 a

0.0 b

7.3 b

0.0 c

0.8 b

13.3 b

Asana XL 0.66 EC

9.6

9.5 a

12.5 a

0.7 c

11.8 a

0.0 b

7.0 b

0.0 c

0.0 b

13.0 b

Warrior T 1 EC

3.84

10.0 a

12.3 a

0.3 c

12.0 a

0.0 b

11.3 b

0.0 c

2.5 b

12.1 b

Dimilin 2 L

1

8.3 a

12.0 a

9.3 a

14.3 a

2.2 b

13.3 b

1.4 b

8.3 b

16.8 b

     + Crop oil

16

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dimilin 2 L

2

8.0 a

11.0 a

7.2 b

11.5 a

0.6 b

8.8 b

0.5 c

4.3 b

12.8 b

     + Crop oil

16

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Means within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (ANOVA, Fisher’s PLSD, P<0.05).

a 21 DAT – No larval counts were taken, because larvae had dropped to soil to pupate.

Part II.  Materials Tested for Arthropod Management

 

Insecticide Efficacy against Sunflower beetles on Sunflower, 2004

 

Trade name

Formulation

Composition

Chemical name

Common name

Source

Asana XL

EC

0.66 lb AI/gal

esfenvalerate

asana XL

Dupont

Baythroid

EC

2 lb AI/gal

cyfluthrin

baythroid

Bayer Crop Science

Dimilin

L

2 lb AI/gal

diflubenzuron

dimilin

Crompton Uniroyal Chemical

Furadan

F

4 lb AI/gal      

carbofuran

furadan

FMC Corp.

Mustang Max 

EC

0.8 lb AI/gal           

cypermethrin

cypermethrin

FMC Corp.

Warrior T 

EC

1 lb AI/gal           

cyhalothrin

warrior

Syngenta Crop Protection

Prime oil           

-          

-          

petroleum distillates

crop oil concentrate

Agrisolutions


Other Pest Links
 

NDSU Department of Entomology

NDSU Department of Plant Pathology

IPM-Integrated Pest Management

NDSU Publications

NDSU Agriculture

| To NCREC |
 

News Publications Academics Research Extension Calendar Weather Directory for Employees

 
North Dakota State University
NDSU Agriculture
VP and Dean of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Natural Resources
NDSU Extension Service
College of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Natural Resources
State Board of Agricultural Research and Education
North Central Research Extension Center
5400 Highway 83 South
Minot, ND 58701--7662
Tel. 701.857.7677
Fax. 701.857.7676
http://www.ag.ndsu.nodak.edu/minot

Last Updated: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 10:26:36 AM
Published by North Dakota State University