![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Treatment |
Product Rate |
6/12 |
7/3 |
7/18 |
|
|
Wioa |
Wioa |
Wioa |
|||
|
oz/A |
----- % Control ----- |
||||
|
1 |
Immb+Thif&Trib+Act 90 |
5+0.22+0.25% |
76 |
85 |
96 |
|
2 |
Dife+Thif&Trib |
12+0.22 |
68 |
60 |
50 |
|
3 |
Tral+Brox&MCPA+Supercharge+AMS |
2.9+8+0.5%+20.4 |
85 |
85 |
81 |
|
4 |
Clodinafop+Brox&MCPA+DSV |
0.8+8+0.8% |
90 |
90 |
85 |
|
5 |
Fenoxaprop+Brox&MCPA |
1.32+8 |
72 |
76 |
82 |
|
6 |
Flcz+Thif&Trib+2,4-Dioe+Act 90 |
0.42+0.22+4+0.25% |
90 |
94 |
99 |
|
7 |
Immb+Dife+Thif&Trib+Act 90 |
3.7+8+0.22+0.25% |
78 |
74 |
88 |
|
8 |
Flcz+Fenoxaprop+Brox&MCPA+Act 90 |
0.28+0.48+8+0.25% |
86 |
91 |
92 |
|
9 |
Flcz+Fenoxaprop+Brox&MCPA+Act 90 |
0.28+0.66+8+0.25% |
91 |
88 |
92 |
|
10 |
Flucarbazone+Fenoxaprop+Brox&MCPA |
0.28+0.66+8 |
78 |
94 |
96 |
|
11 |
Flcz+Clodinafop+Brox&MCPA+DSV+Act 90 |
0.28+0.5+8+0.8%+0.25% |
89 |
96 |
97 |
|
12 |
Untreated |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
C.V. % |
16.3 |
18.3 |
13.1 |
||
|
LSD 5% |
18 |
20 |
15 |
||
Summary
Crop injury was not observed on any treatment (data not shown). The difenzoquat treatment (trt 2) had poor season long wild oat control and had significantly lower wild oat control than the other treatments. Flucarbazone treatments (trts 6, 8, 9, 10 & 11) provided excellent season long wild oat control. Flucarbazone tank mix partners did not enhance or decrease wild oat control.
Home|Events|Livestock|Economics|Agronomy|Range|Dakota Ram|Sites|Staff|Mission|Contact