![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Treatment |
Product Rate |
5/29 |
6/7 |
6/12 |
7/30 |
|
|
HRSW |
HRSW |
Kocz |
Kocz |
|||
|
% Injury |
% Control |
|||||
|
1 |
Fluroxypyr |
0.25 |
0 |
0 |
86 |
70 |
|
2 |
Fluroxypyr |
0.5 |
0 |
0 |
94 |
86 |
|
3 |
Fluroxypyr |
1 |
0 |
0 |
94 |
89 |
|
4 |
Fluroxypyr |
1.5 |
0 |
0 |
95 |
79 |
|
5 |
Fluroxypyr |
2 |
0 |
5 |
95 |
82 |
|
6 |
Brox & MCPA (4 lb formulation) |
8 |
0 |
1 |
95 |
94 |
|
7 |
Brox & MCPA (5 lb formulation) |
8 |
2 |
1 |
95 |
92 |
|
8 |
Fluroxypyr & MCPA |
8 |
0 |
2 |
95 |
95 |
|
9 |
Fluroxypyr & 2,4-D |
7.5 |
1 |
0 |
95 |
94 |
|
10 |
Dicamba + MCPA |
1.5 + 4 |
2 |
7 |
95 |
94 |
|
11 |
Thif & Trib + Flox & MCPA |
0.22 + 5.4 |
6 |
3 |
95 |
94 |
|
12 |
Thif&Trib+Carf+MCPA+Act 90+UAN |
0.22+0.128+4+.25%+4% |
6 |
5 |
95 |
94 |
|
13 |
Carf + MCPA + Act 90 + UAN |
0.128 + 6 + .25% + 4% |
14 |
4 |
94 |
95 |
|
14 |
Carf + Flox & MCPA + Act 90 + UAN |
0.128 + 5.6 + .25% + 4% |
15 |
0 |
95 |
91 |
|
15 |
Untreated |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
C.V. % |
47.9 |
230 |
2.6 |
14.7 |
||
|
LSD 5% |
2 |
ns |
3 |
17 |
||
Summary
Carfentrazone treatments (trts 13 & 14) caused significant but temporary crop injury (chlorosis). All herbicide treatments provided excellent season long kochia control except for the low rate of Fluroxypyr (trt 1) and the two high rates of Fluroxypyr (trts 4 & 5) which had good initial levels of control but declined after that point.
Home|Events|Livestock|Economics|Agronomy|Range|Dakota Ram|Sites|Staff|Mission|Contact