![]()
| 2006 Annual Report Beef Section | Dickinson
Research Extension Center 1089 State Avenue Dickinson, ND 58601 |
![]()
Click Here
for Printer Friendly version
Effect of
Alternative Management Systems on Wintering
(ABSTRACT)
A. Johnsrud†,
Winter
Grazing is very important to farmers and ranchers in Western North Dakota.
Ranchers can save money if there is a logical and economical way to feed and
manage cattle. Winter grazing is becoming more and more acceptable because it
can become very expensive to winter cattle for 5 months in a dry lot situation.
The objective of this study was to relate cow performance with the economics of
alternative winter-feeding methods by grazing standing corn, oat swaths, and
oat hay in a dry lot. Cattle were weighed every two weeks and were assigned a
body condition score. Stocking rates varied with year and treatment replicates
and was estimated at the beginning of the grazing period to provide enough grazing
pressure to remove 50% of available forage in 8 weeks. The oat hay feeding
areas were mob grazed prior to the initiation of the grazing period to remove
all grazable forage. Final body weights were affected by a year by treatment
interaction (P = .06). However, in each year, corn provided the greatest amount
of gain, swaths the least, and dry lot tended to be intermediate. Over the 8
week period, cattle on all treatments gained weight (P<.01). Overall, cattle
maintained body condition in year 1 and lost body condition in year 2.
Management systems affected body condition in both years (P<.1). In week 4,
corn had the greatest body condition, swaths had the least, and the dry lot was
intermediate. Body condition in week 6 was affected by a year by treatment
interaction (P = .06). Corn had the greatest body condition in both years. Dry
lot was least and swath intermediate in year 1, the inverse was true in year 2.
Corn supported the greatest gain in body weight and condition. Oat swath
grazing was generally comparable of oat hay. The two alternative methods of
winter-feeding are viable for Western North Dakota ranchers. This study does
not include expenses such as labor, cost of seed, or fertilizer.
![]()
[ Back to 2006 Annual Report Index ] [ Back to Beef Reports ]
[ DREC Home ] [ Contact DREC ] [ Top of Page ]
![]()