![]()
|
2002 Annual Report Grassland Section |
Dickinson
Research Extension Center
1089 State Avenue Dickinson, ND 58601 |
![]()
Monitoring
Grasslands Is Important
Llewellyn
L. Manske PhD
Range Scientist
North Dakota
State University
Dickinson Research
Extension Center
Grasslands that are not
performing close to their potential reduce the profit margins from the production
of beef. Healthy grassland ecosystems produce greater quantities of herbage
and more pounds of calf per acre than grasslands in good condition. The result
is greater profit margins on healthy grasslands. Improving grasslands from an
average condition to a healthy status
Improving the health performance
status of grassland ecosystems requires two steps: first, implementing grazing
management practices that meet the biological requirements of the plants and
that coordinate grazing periods with grass growth stages so that both vegetative
reproduction by tillering and activity of rhizosphere organisms are stimulated,
and second, monitoring the response of grassland ecosystem performance to the
changes in management practices. The response of biological mechanisms and ecosystem
processes to changes in management strategy is slow, and the response of grassland
ecosystem performance to management practices occurs in annual incremental changes,
both positive and negative, which may be evident only through annual monitoring.
Management practices that
focus on meeting the biological requirements of plants can sustain a healthy
grassland ecosystem over time. The performance levels of the plant component
of a grassland ecosystem regulate the performance levels of all the other components
of the ecosystem. Plants are the primary producers, converting light energy
into chemical energy during photosynthesis. This captured solar energy is the
primary force driving all ecosystem functions and provides the foundation for
all uses of grasslands. By meeting the biological requirements of the plants
and facilitating the operation of ecological processes at potential levels,
proper management practices improve the performance levels of all grassland
ecosystem components or maintain the health status and productivity of a grassland
ecosystem functioning at high performance levels.
Monitoring the changes
in the performance levels of several components of the grassland ecosystem over
time provides indirect indication of the status of grassland ecosystem health.
Grassland ecosystem monitoring can be accomplished rapidly and inexpensively
through the use of the grassland ecosystem monitoring (GEM) method developed
by North Dakota State University range scientists. This method comprises three
simple procedures: taking plot photographs, compiling a major plant species
present list, and completing a health status assessment. Ecosystem components
considered during health status assessment procedures are aboveground vegetation,
belowground plant structures, soil development processes, levels and types of
erosion, ecological processes, and precipitation infiltration. With the grassland
ecosystem monitoring procedures, ranchers can collect nonscientific, nonquantitative
information that can be used to assess the performance status of grassland ecosystems,
document changes in the ecosystem, and evaluate the effectiveness of management
practices.
Implementation of beneficial management practices will improve the status of grassland ecosystem health, and annual monitoring will allow managers to evaluate changes in performance levels and to adjust management practices to ensure that the grassland ecosystems are functioning at high performance levels. Strengthening the status of health of the grassland ecosystem will provide improvement in livestock weight performance, reductions in livestock production costs, and increases in profit margins.
![]()
[ Back to 2002 Annual Report Index ] [ Back to Grassland Reports ]
[ DREC Home ] [ Contact DREC ] [ Top of Page ]
![]()