NDSU Department of Child Development and Family Science
North Dakota Department of Human Services


The North Dakota Journal of Human Services

June 1998



Children of Divorce: A Program Evaluation

James E. Deal, Ph.D., Associate Professor and Chair, Department of Child Development and Family Science, North Dakota State University 283 EML, Fargo, ND 58105

Geraldine Bosch, M.S., 4-H Youth Development Specialist, Extension 4-H and Youth, North Dakota State University

Gregory F. Sanders, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Department of Child Development and Family Science, and Associate Dean, College of Human Development and Education, North Dakota State University

Daniel J. Klenow, Ph.D., Professor, Department of Sociology, North Dakota State University



Abstract

Parental divorce affects many North Dakota children each year, and a number of negative outcomes have been documented for children who have experienced a family breakup. Loyalty conflicts are especially stressful for children and are affected largely by parents' actions during and following the divorce.

The North Dakota Extension State University Service provides an educational program designed to help parents help their children through a divorce. The purpose of the current paper is to describe this program and present an evaluation of it.

Overall, parents indicated that the program contributed to their understanding of how children experience divorce and influenced their behavior related to issues of divorce affecting their children.



Children of Divorce: A Program Evaluation

By age 15, approximately one-third of all children in the United States will have experienced a family breakup (Furstennberg, Nord, Peterson, & Zill, 1983) and divorce hits over one million children each year (Public Health Service, 1995). The experience of children following the divorce of parents has been documented in detail through a considerable body of research. The purpose of the present paper is to examine the effects of a program designed to help parents help their children through a divorce.

Children respond emotionally to divorce with feelings of anger, denial, fear, and sadness and experience physical symptoms such as headaches, stomach aches and bed wetting (Bonkowski, 1987). Parental conflict following divorce further contributes to poor adjustment of children (Hetherington, Cox & Cox, 1982) as does lack of visitation by the noncustodial parent (Kruk, 1992).

Loyalty conflicts are also a common experience for children (Boszormenyi-Nagy & Krasner, 1986), and parents often intensify those feelings through continued conflict with one-another. Further, many parents place demands on their children for loyalty toward them and disloyalty toward the other spouse (Wallerstein & Kelly, 1980). Children rated "being caught in the middle" as one of the 10 most stressful experiences (Wolchik, Sandler, Braver, & Fogas, 1985). Wallerstein (1989) suggested that continued conflict between parents was the most common reason for poor adjustment in children following divorce.

Braver, Salem, Pearson and DeLusé (1996) surveyed 102 divorce education programs and found the most frequently covered topics were the effects of divorce on children and the benefits of parental cooperation. A number of these types of programs have been developed with the specific goals of helping decrease negative effects of divorce on children, mostly through education and skill development in parents and increased parental cooperation/decreased conflict. In one project, high school students whose parents were divorced responded to a questionnaire regarding typical ways children were put in the middle of divorced parents and the stress they experienced as a result. Parents were given a summary of this information on the types and effects of parental conflict that places children in the middle. Simply receiving this information produced a significant change in parental behaviors (Kurkowski, Gordon, & Arbuthnot, 1993).

Another program offered four two-hour sessions providing information on effects of divorce on children, separating needs of children from the needs of parents, custody law, and communication and negotiation. Participating parents experienced significant positive changes in attitude about cooperation and communication (Zibbell, 1992). Frieman, Garon, and Mandell (1994) found that parents who attended two three-hour sessions on children of separation and divorce became more knowledgeable about how divorce affects children and how children cope with divorce, and felt they could be proactive in helping children deal with these issues.

This research indicates both the difficulties children encounter as a result of divorce experiences and the types of efforts being made to make the divorce of parents less stressful for children. The purposes of the current paper are to describe a Children of Divorce program for parents currently being offered in North Dakota and to present the evaluation of that program. The specific research questions for this study included:

  1. Do parents perceive the program as contributing to their understanding of how children experience divorce?
  2. Do parents perceive the program as influencing their behavior related to issues of divorce affecting their children?
  3. What is the relation between parents' perception of their understanding of children of divorce issues and their behavior related to those issues?



Program description

Children of Divorce: A Parenting Program is an educational workshop that combines knowledge from research, family education, and therapy. This four hour parenting workshop is organized for parents who are divorced or in the process of divorce. The program helps parents understand the impact of the divorce on their children and provides specific concrete actions that parents can take to help their children. It is not a counseling session but focuses on "what to do" and "how to help" children during and after divorce. The goal is to benefit children by working directly with the parents in an educational setting. The intent of this program is to provide specific education on the effects of divorce on children and to encourage parents to focus on the needs of their children and separate them from their own needs as parents and former spouses. The program content includes four units:

(A) Divorce - A Form of Change, explaining divorce to children and an overview of the impact on children;

(B) Communication Guidelines, what your children want to know, dos and don'ts of communication, divorce as warfare, and grief;

(C) Children's Reactions to Divorce, understanding children's reaction to divorce based on developmental levels, and helpful behaviors for parents;

(D) Effective Co-Parenting, effective methods and appropriate resources.

Specific program guidelines have been developed to promote an optimum learning environment for parents. These include:

  1. Professionals with degrees in counseling, social work, education, home economics or related field are trained as facilitators.
  2. An agreement is signed between the trained facilitator and program coordinators stating expectations, guidelines and requirements pertinent to the Children of Divorce program.
  3. Ideal group sizes of 10 -15 participants are employed.
  4. Both parents are encouraged to attend but not necessarily together.
  5. A classroom format is suggested.
  6. This is an educational effort for the parents, not a counseling session. The program is not intended to take the place of divorce mediation or family therapy. The program maintains an educational focus that follows a clear, set agenda.
  7. The program material is developed for parents in non-abusive relationships.
  8. Child care should be considered.
  9. The facilitator role is to be shared by a male and female to model the parent roles.
  10. Confidentiality is stressed.
  11. Security could be considered at each session.



Method and results

The data presented in this report were originally collected by Klenow (1997). From April 1994 to December 1996, approximately 130 individuals participated in Children of Divorce (COD) workshops; 63 of these (48%) were contacted by phone, and responded to an 18 question survey instrument asking about their experiences in the workshop and during the ensuing time. Thirteen items measured parental perceptions of the program. These items focused on the effects of the program on understanding the impact of divorce and parental conflict on children, developmental issues related to children's response to divorce, feelings of children regarding responsibility for the divorce, and the need for consistent routines following a divorce. Items also focused on how parental behavior had changed as a result of the program in areas of lawyer contact, cooperation and communication with ex-spouse, and ability to help children deal with losses.

Participants were also asked whether the program should be mandatory and whether they were glad they attended. The response categories for these items ranged from strongly agree to strongly disagree (on the 5 point scale, 5=strongly agree). Parents were also asked how interested they were in more sessions and in receiving a newsletter on children and divorce. Open-ended questions were asked to gather examples of how workshop material was used, topics respondents would like to learn more about, and ways in which the information made a difference. Of these 63 individuals, 8% had completed the program in 1994, 38% had completed in 1995, and 54% had completed in 1996, with length of time since completion ranging from two months to 34 months. At the time of the interview, 17.5% of the respondents were in the process of divorcing, 20.6% reported having divorced "recently," 54% reported divorcing within the past one to five years, and 7.9% reported having been divorced more than five years.

  1. Do parents perceive the program as contributing to their understanding of how children experience divorce?

    Overall, most of the parents who responded indicated that, because of the information presented, they had a better understanding of the effects of divorce on children (53% Agree; 28% Strongly Agree); were more "aware of the fact that there are warning signals that may affect my children" (49% Agree; 38% Strongly Agree); "better understand how children experiencing divorce may feel responsible for the divorce" (49% Agree; 37% Strongly Agree); and realize the importance of a child's routine (35% Agree; 52% Strongly Agree). Parents also indicated that in the program they learned not to use the child as a messenger (33% Agree; 51% Strongly Agree); and became aware that children react differently to divorce based on their developmental stage (46% Agree; 49% Strongly Agree).
  1. Do parents perceive the program as influencing their behavior related to issues of divorce affecting their children?

    Responses to Likert scale items used to answer research questions 1 and 2 are presented in Table 1. The majority of parents agreed (59%) or strongly agreed (22%) with the general statement that "The information I received at the Children of Divorce session has influenced decisions I am making about my children." Those who agreed or strongly agreed with this statement were asked to indicate some specific examples of things they had used from the workshop. Most of the responses related to communication efforts with the children or the ex-spouse:



Table 1. Evaluation responses to Children of Divorce Program.

                       Strongly                       Strongly
Item                    Agree      Agree    Neutral   Disagree  Disagree
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          5          4         3         2         1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better understanding  29.7%(19)  53.1%(34)  12.5%(8)  3.1%(2)   1.6%(1)
of effects on
children
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information           21.9%(14)  59.4%(38)  12.5%(8)  4.7%(3)   1.6%(1)
influenced decision
making about my
children
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Making a stronger     21.0%(13)  46.8%(29)  21.0%(13) 6.5%(4)   4.8%(3)
effort to work with
ex-spouse
------------------------------------------------------------------------
More aware of         38.1%(24)  49.2%(31)   9.5%(6)  3.2%(2)   0.0%(0)
warning signals
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Understanding of how  36.5%(23)  49.2%(31)  11.1%(7)  3.2%(2)   0.0%(0)
children feel
responsible for
divorce
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Realize the           52.4%(33)  34.9%(22)  11.1%(7)  1.6%(1)   0.0%(0)
importance of a
child's routine
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tried new ways to      6.6%(3)   52.5%(32)  24.6%(15) 11.5%(7)  4.9%(3)
communicate with
ex-spouse
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learned not to use    50.8%(32)  33.3%(21)  14.3%(9)   0.0%(0)  1.6%(1)
child as messenger
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Able to help          27.4%(17)  58.1%(36)  12.9%(8)   1.6%(1)  0.0%(0)
child(ren) deal
with loss
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now aware that        49.2%(31)  46.0%(29)   3.2%(2)   1.6%(1)  0.0%(0)
children react
differently 
to divorce
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Parents also indicated other behaviors/actions they had tried since the workshop:

They also agreed that the class influenced them to make a stronger effort to work with their ex-spouse for the sake of the children (47% Agree; 21% Strongly Agree) and that they had tried new ways to communicate with their ex-spouse concerning the children (53% Agree; 7% Strongly Agree). However, only 8% responded "yes" to the question "Has the information that you learned in the Children of Divorce sessions led to less time being spent on legal issues and attorney involvement in your divorce?"

  1. What is the relation between parents' perception of their understanding of children of divorce issues and their behavior related to those issues?

    To determine this, Pearson correlations were computed between each of the specific areas of knowledge gained and each of the parent's self-report of behavior changes. Respondents who reported having a better understanding of the effects of divorce on children felt that the information presented had an influence on their decisions (r = .53, p < .01) and indicated that the information enabled them to help their children deal with their losses due to the divorce (r = .32; p < .05). There was no relation between having a better understanding of how divorce affects children and the time spent on legal issues and attorney involvement, making a stronger effort to work with my ex-spouse for the sake of the children, or having tried new ways to communicate with their ex-spouse concerning the children.

    Responses to the item "Because of information presented in the workshop, I am aware of the fact that there are warning signals that may impact my children" were not significantly correlated with any of the behavioral items. Respondents who indicated that the session helped them better understand how children experiencing divorce may feel responsible for the divorce more highly agreed that the information has influenced decisions about the children (r = .33; p < .05), the information has led to less time being spent on legal issues and attorney involvement in the divorce (r = .31; p < .05), and the information has caused them to make a stronger effort to work with my ex-spouse for the sake of the children (r = .28; p < .05). None of the other behavioral items were related to this learning item.

    The item "Because of the information, I better understand that children need to have routines maintained during a divorce" was significantly related to the perception that the information has influenced decisions about the children (r = .35; p < .01), the perception that information has caused them to make a stronger effort to work with my ex-spouse for the sake of the children (r = .39; p < .01), and the perception that the information has enabled them to help their children deal with their losses due to the divorce (r = .28; p < .05).

    Another information item related to whether the session helped parents to know that they should not use their children as a messenger to the other parent. Responses to this item were significantly related only to the behavior item indicating that the information from the session has influenced decisions about the children (r = .27; p < .05). Parents who had a higher level of agreement with the children as messenger information item were more likely to agree that the session influenced decisions.

    The final information item was "Because of information presented in the workshop, I am now aware that children react differently to divorce based on their developmental stage." Parents who agreed with this statement were more likely to indicate that the information led to less time being spent on legal issues and attorney involvement in the divorce (r = .36; p < .01) and that the information has enabled them to help their children deal with their losses due to the divorce (r = .44; p < .01).



Discussion

The workshop sponsored by the North Dakota State University Extension Service, "Children of Divorce: A Parenting Program," is similar to other programs of this type in both content and outcome. Responses to the evaluation indicated changes in attitudes and behaviors for parents who have children. Specifically, parents indicated that the program contributed to their understanding of how children experience divorce and influenced their behavior related to issues of divorce affecting their children.

Although the sample to date inhibits making a strong interpretation of the relations between the specific learning items and behavioral items, the trend does indicate that parents who believe they learn more from the program are also more likely to change their parenting behaviors.

Further research is needed using a control group of divorcing parents to study differences between those who have had the program and those who have not. In addition, the long term impact of the program needs to be assessed through surveying the parents periodically for several years following the program. Other issues need to be studied to assess the generalizability of the program. For example, the current participants were mostly voluntary attendees. Although 84% of the respondents feel the program should be mandatory, we need to evaluate whether the program will be as effective for mandatory attendees. Perhaps most important is the need to study the experience of children whose parents have or have not had the program. The current study, as well as most research to date, has focused on the parent's perception of the program and its value.

Currently, the Children of Divorce program has spread beyond its original focus on North Dakota's Cass County to other areas in the state. In addition, the program will soon be available to Minnesota residents who, when divorcing, are now mandated by the Minnesota Court System to attend a parenting education class for divorcing parents. A program for children whose parents are divorcing has also been developed.



References

Bonkowski, S. (1987). Kids are non-divorceable. Chicago: Buckly.

Boszormenyi-Nagy, I. and Krasner, B. (1986). Between give and take: A clinical guide to contextual therapy. New York: Bruner/Mazel.

Braver, S., Salem, P., Pearson, J., and DeLusé, S. (1996). The content of divorce education programs: Results of a survey. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 34(1), 41-59.

Frieman, B., Garon, R., Mandell, B. (1994). Parenting seminars for divorcing parents. Social Work, 39(5), 607-610.

Furstennberg, F., Nord, C., Peterson, J., and Zill, N. (1983). The life course of children of divorce: Marital disruption and parental contact. American Sociological Review, 48, 667.

Hetherington, M.E., Cox, F., and Cox, R. (1982). Effects of divorce on parents and children. In M. Lamb (Ed.), Non-traditional families (pp.233-388). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Klenow, D. (1997). Children of Divorce longitudinal evaluation survey. Fargo, ND: North Dakota Extension Service.

Kruk, E. (1992). Psychological and structural factors contributing to the disengagement of noncustodial fathers after divorce. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 30, 81-101.

Kurkowski, K., Gordon, D., & Arbuthnot, J. (1993). Children caught in the middle: A brief educational intervention for divorced parents. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 20 (3/4), 139-151.

Public Health Service (1995). Annual summary of births, marriages, divorces, and deaths: United States, 1994. Monthly Vital Statistics Reports, 43 (13), 5.

Wallerstein, J. (August, 1989). Children of divorce. Workshop sponsored by Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Eastham, MA.

Wallerstein, J. and Kelly, J. (1980). Beyond the breakup. New York: Basic Books.

Zibbell, R. A. (1992). A short-term, small-group education and counseling program for separated and divorced parents in conflict. Journal of divorce and remarriage, 18 (1/2), 189-203.


[ Home ]


The North Dakota Journal of Human Services, June 1998