Irrigation Growth
Requires Research and Monitoring to Protect Water
By Bruce Seelig, Water Quality Program Monitor
NDSU Extension
Service
At a recent meeting at
"Although most of the discussion at the
meeting was directed toward agricultural production, it’s significant that
producers and others involved in irrigation development are raising these issues
so they can be addressed," says Bruce Seelig, a water
quality specialist at
Irrigation has been associated with
groundwater contamination in several states, Seelig
notes. Evidence shows a connection between irrigation and high nitrates in some
aquifers in
Incidences of pesticide contamination
in
Another concern is the observation of
increased levels of sulfate and total salts in some monitoring wells. Elevated
sulfate salts in groundwater can result in water that no longer meets drinking
water quality standards. Salts can also build up in some irrigated soils,
resulting in poor growing conditions for crops.
"Although it is extremely difficult to
predict impacts of irrigation on groundwater at a specific site, we understand
enough about contaminant translocation and fate to identify important factors
that influence these processes," Seelig says. "We can
use those factors to identify aquifer sensitivity. Once we know the potential
for contamination to occur at a particular site, we can take steps to protect
the groundwater by implementing appropriate management practices which may
include modifications to existing irrigation systems."
Seelig says research is needed in
Specifically, research is needed to
improve nitrogen use efficiency, particularly in areas of high contamination
risk, Seelig says. "Research projects that improve our
understanding of the denitrification process in
various aquifers should be expanded. Improved knowledge of the interactions
between soil properties and irrigation water quality remains an important area
of scientific study."
Although groundwater usually is the
focus of most environmental concern surrounding irrigation, soil conservation
and surface water protection also need to be addressed. "Soils that are best for
irrigation also are often most prone to erosion," Seelig says. "Control of sediment losses and the movement of
associated nutrients and pesticides from irrigated fields is often difficult
because of the crop rotations thought to be most profitable. We need to identify
crop rotation alternatives that preserve both the soil and profitability."
Monitoring by the state’s Water
Commission and Department of Health indicate that impacts to North Dakota water
resources from agricultural activities have been minimal. However, incidents of
contamination do occur, and many water resources are threatened by potential
contamination.
There continues to be a need to further
understand processes and factors important to contaminant movement and fate
under